Mauryan Empire MCQs for UPSC Prelims

47 practice questions on Mauryan Empire from the Ancient & Medieval History section of the UPSC Prelims syllabus. 47 come with a written explanation and 6 are actual previous year questions. Try the sample set below - the answer stays hidden until you ask for it.

7 Easy 18 Medium 22 Hard 6 from past papers

Sample questions

Q1
Previous year question medium

Who of the following had first deciphered the edicts of Emperor Ashoka?

  1. A Georg Bühler
  2. B James Prinsep
  3. C Max Müller
  4. D William Jones
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B - James Prinsep

James Prinsep, an officer of the East India Company mint, first deciphered the Brahmi and Kharoshthi scripts in 1837, which made it possible to read Ashoka's edicts. Georg Bühler was a later Indologist who worked on Indian scripts and inscriptions but did not achieve the first decipherment, so option (a) is wrong. Max Müller was renowned for his work on the Vedas and comparative philology, not epigraphy, ruling out option (c). William Jones founded the Asiatic Society and identified Indo-European linguistic links but did not decipher the Ashokan edicts, eliminating option (d).

Q2
Previous year question hard

Consider the following pairs: Site of Ashoka's major rock edicts - Location in the State of 1. Dhauli - Odisha 2. Erragudi - Andhra Pradesh 3. Jaugada - Madhya Pradesh 4. Kalsi - Karnataka How many pairs given above are correctly matched?

  1. A Only one pair
  2. B Only two pairs
  3. C Only three pairs
  4. D All four pairs
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B - Only two pairs

Dhauli, near Bhubaneswar in Odisha, and Erragudi in Andhra Pradesh are both genuine major rock edict sites correctly placed, so pairs 1 and 2 are right. Jaugada is also in Odisha, in the Ganjam region, not in Madhya Pradesh, so pair 3 is wrong. Kalsi lies in Uttarakhand near Dehradun, not in Karnataka, so pair 4 is wrong. With exactly two correct matches, the answer is only two pairs.

Q3
Previous year question easy

Who among the following rulers advised his subjects through this inscription? "Whosoever praises his religious sect or blames other sects out of excessive devotion to his own sect, with the view of glorifying his own sect, he rather injures his own sect very severely."

  1. A Ashoka
  2. B Samudragupta
  3. C Harshavardhana
  4. D Krishnadeva Raya
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A - Ashoka

This passage is from Ashoka's Major Rock Edict XII, which preaches restraint in glorifying one's own sect and condemns disparaging other sects, urging concourse and respect among all religious communities. The sentiment of tolerance expressed through royal edicts inscribed on rocks and pillars is the hallmark of Ashoka's dhamma policy in the third century BCE. Samudragupta is known from the Allahabad pillar inscription, a eulogy of his conquests, not a sermon on sectarian tolerance. Harshavardhana patronised Buddhism but issued no such edict series, and Krishnadeva Raya of Vijayanagara is associated with literary works like Amuktamalyada, not rock edicts.

Q4
Previous year question medium

Ashokan inscriptions suggest that the 'Pradeshika', 'Rajuka' and 'Yukta' were important officers at the

  1. A village-level administration
  2. B district-level administration
  3. C provincial administration
  4. D level of the central administration
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B - district-level administration

Ashoka's Rock Edict III directs the Pradeshika, Rajuka and Yukta to go on tours every five years for the propagation of dhamma and administrative work; these functionaries operated at the district tier of Mauryan administration, with the Pradeshika as district head, the Rajuka in charge of land and justice, and the Yukta as a subordinate accounting official. Hence (b) is correct. Village-level functionaries were the gramika and gramabhojaka, so (a) is wrong. Provinces were governed by princes (kumaras) as viceroys, so (c) is wrong, and the central administration revolved around the king, mantriparishad and amatyas, so (d) is also wrong.

Q5
Previous year question hard

According to Kautilya's Arthashastra, which of the following are correct? 1. A person could be a slave as a result of a judicial punishment. 2. If a female slave bore her master a son, she was legally free. 3. If a son born to a female slave was fathered by her master, the son was entitled to the legal status of the master's son. Which of the statements given above are correct?

  1. A 1 and 2 only
  2. B 2 and 3 only
  3. C 1 and 3 only
  4. D 1, 2 and 3
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B - 2 and 3 only

The Arthashastra lays down that when a master begets a son on his female slave, both the mother and the child are to be treated as free, and the child gets the legal standing of the master's own son, so statements 2 and 3 are correct. The official UPSC key treated statement 1 as incorrect, reflecting the text's strong protections for Aryas, who could not be reduced to slavery, with bondage arising chiefly through capture, sale or self-pledge rather than as a judicial punishment. Several historians read the text differently, which made this question controversial, but the official key settles on 2 and 3 only.

Q6
Previous year question hard

In which of the following relief sculpture inscriptions is 'Ranyo Ashoka' (King Ashoka) mentioned along with the stone portrait of Ashoka?

  1. A Kanganahalli
  2. B Sanchi
  3. C Shahbazgarhi
  4. D Sohgaura
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: A - Kanganahalli

At Kanaganahalli (near Sannati in Kalaburagi district, Karnataka), excavations of the Maha Stupa revealed a sculpted slab showing the emperor with his queens, labelled 'Ranyo Ashoka' in Brahmi, one of the very few labelled stone portraits of Ashoka. Sanchi has rich relief sculpture but no labelled portrait of Ashoka identifying him by name. Shahbazgarhi in Pakistan is a Major Rock Edict site inscribed in Kharosthi script, not a relief sculpture portraying the king. Sohgaura is associated with a Mauryan copper plate inscription, not with any Ashokan portrait.

Q7
medium

With reference to Mauryan administration as described in the Arthashastra, the official designated 'Sannidhata' was primarily responsible for:

  1. A Collection of revenue from the provinces
  2. B The royal treasury and storehouse (custodian of the treasury)
  3. C Supervision of espionage networks
  4. D Administration of justice in the capital
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: B - The royal treasury and storehouse (custodian of the treasury)

In Kautilya's Arthashastra, the Sannidhata was the chief treasurer and custodian of the state storehouse, while the Samaharta was the collector-general of revenue. Distinguishing these two high officials is a common point of testing.

Q8
hard

Consider the following statements regarding Mauryan administration as known from the Arthashastra and inscriptions: 1. The 'Rajukas' were officials connected with rural administration and, under Ashoka, were entrusted with welfare functions. 2. The term 'Dhamma Mahamatta' refers to a class of officers appointed by Ashoka to propagate and oversee his policy of Dhamma. 3. 'Sita' lands in the Arthashastra refer to crown lands cultivated directly under the state. How many of the statements given above are correct?

  1. A Only one
  2. B Only two
  3. C All three
  4. D None
Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: C - All three

All three statements are correct. Rajukas were officers associated with rural/provincial administration; Ashoka's Pillar Edicts mention entrusting them with the welfare of the people. Dhamma Mahamattas were a special cadre of officers created by Ashoka to spread and supervise Dhamma. In the Arthashastra, 'sita' denotes crown land cultivated directly by the state (often with hired labour or slaves). As each statement is accurate, the answer is 'All three'.

Practice all 47 Mauryan Empire questions free

Timed practice, instant scoring, and explanations for every question. Free forever - no card, no catch.